Played a course recently where I noticed excessive wear and tear in specific locations on some of the tees.
As I reflected on the wear and tear patterns it became obvious that the club had been neglectful in pruning or removing trees that were now encroaching into the corridors of play.
The excessive wear and tear was caused by golfers attempting to avoid trees that were now invading the lines of play.
The tees had large patches of seeded soil in areas where the golfers were forced to play as a result of the placement of the tee markers, and were obviously a maintainance concern.
As I thought about this issue, it became more and more apparent that the problem wasn't with the tees, but, in the club's failure to even notice the root cause (pun intended)
All that was needed was for prudent pruning and removal.
The second thought that occured to me was that neglect, benign or intended, was frustrating the architects tactical intent.
That the tree growth had eliminated the ability of the golfer to decide HOW to play the hole and WHERE to position himself on the tee to give him the best advantage, based on his game, on how attack the hole.
Throughout my round I noticed this situation on five or more tees and in certain fairway locations.
In one instance, a ball driven into the left center of the fairway had the approach to the green totally blocked, causing the golfer to have to hit a long second shot toward the Out of bounds side of the hole, from a left to right lie (formula for disaster)
When I asked a few members about how this apparent dilema was allowed to occur and continue, they responded that those in charge (members) would never accept any suggestions with respect to the care of the golf course and that they had little if any understanding of GCA. I then wondered how they were appointed to their respective positions. But, upon further reflection, I knew the answer to that question
I was also told that there was some consideration to moving some of the tees.
While I wasn't surprised, I thought, how BLIND can these people be ?
All they needed was to trim or remove the invasive trees, not rebuild Rome.
I then wondered if the Superintendent recognized the dilema.
Certainly, if he was a golfer, the situation would have to manifest itself to him during the course of his play.
So, in these difficult times, here's a club pondering whether to shift or rebuild some tees when all that's needed is to pare back invasive tree growth.
The question are, why don't those in charge see this dilema ? (it's supposed to be their job)
And, why won't those in charge listen and act on constructive criticism and recognize the problem and the solution once it's been pointed out to them
Have you noticed wear and tear on tees in particular areas, caused by invasive tree growth ?
Have you noticed a trend to narrow and restrict the tee markers to specific areas thus frustrating the architects intent ?