News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Chip Gaskins

Pine Hill Golf Club
« on: August 15, 2009, 09:00:47 AM »
Anyone play Pine Hill lately?  What is the general consensus on the course?  The pictures look pretty solid.  Looks rugged for Fazio (which is good IMO).

Chip

Mike Sweeney

Re: Pine Hill Golf Club
« Reply #1 on: August 15, 2009, 09:11:06 AM »
Probably one of my Top 5 biggest disappoinments. Visually it looks great in pics and oh how I wanted those snobby golf raters Cirba and Redanman to be wrong, but they were not.

Drive to an upper tee, drive to a lower fairway that has been built up and back up to a green, drive to next tee and repeat. There is a reason that former ski hills should not become golf courses.

It has some fun shots and pieces are very good, but the package as a whole is Doak 4.5 for a walker and 5.5 if you are a cart ball guy.

Joe Bausch

Re: Pine Hill Golf Club
« Reply #2 on: August 15, 2009, 09:53:08 AM »
I played it again back in June and started this thread:

http://golfclubatlas.com/forum/index.php/topic,40276.0/

I really believe the course is a bit underrated by many raters b/c:

1.  It was compared to PV when it opened (and is geographically very close to it).
2.  It is a Tom Fazio design.

Simple as that.

In an ideal world, I would ask to play the back nine twice.  That is how much I like the second nine.
@jwbausch (for new photo albums)
The site for the Cobb's Creek project:  https://cobbscreek.org/
Nearly all Delaware Valley golf courses in photo albums: Bausch Collection

Tom_Doak

Re: Pine Hill Golf Club
« Reply #3 on: August 15, 2009, 10:34:16 AM »
Or is that how much you dislike the first nine, and all those long transitions between holes?

Joe Bausch

Re: Pine Hill Golf Club
« Reply #4 on: August 15, 2009, 10:43:19 AM »
Or is that how much you dislike the first nine, and all those long transitions between holes?

Since I'm a fan of a course being walkable, and the back nine at PH is reasonably walked, the long transitions on the front is one of my criticisms with it.  And as individual holes, I think there are more very good holes on the back (10, 12, 14, especially 17) than the front (3 and 7).
@jwbausch (for new photo albums)
The site for the Cobb's Creek project:  https://cobbscreek.org/
Nearly all Delaware Valley golf courses in photo albums: Bausch Collection

Matt_Ward

Re: Pine Hill Golf Club
« Reply #5 on: August 15, 2009, 02:06:57 PM »
For those who dislike the eye-candy elements of TF you won't find a better example than Pine Hill if you are in the Northeast. I will say this though -- the uphill par-4 9th and the downhill par-4 10th are the only clear reasons to go to the course.

Conversely, if you want to see a first rate TF layout head further east to the AC area and sample Galloway National -- night and day difference between the two.

Jason Walker

Re: Pine Hill Golf Club
« Reply #6 on: August 15, 2009, 02:47:07 PM »
Drive to an upper tee, drive to a lower fairway that has been built up and back up to a green, drive to next tee and repeat. There is a reason that former ski hills should not become golf courses.

Mike Sweeney,
Not to nit-pick, but other than Number 3, Number 10 (Par 4's) and Number 13 and Number 16 (Par 3's), what holes play downhill?

I totally agree with Tom Doak--the front nine routing is disjointed, no question, which is a shame because I think Number 7 and Number 9 are particularly good holes, as is the Par 3 Number 2.

I'm an outgoing member there but I really enjoyed the golf course and over time it really grew on me.  It was a lot of fun to play and to be honest I never got tired of playing it.  It's a shame they never quite figured out the membership thing as iI felt it was a nice contrast to many of the older, classic designs in the area.  Is it the most interesting architecturally?  No, but a fun place to play and be challenged, yes.

Matt_Ward

Re: Pine Hill Golf Club
« Reply #7 on: August 15, 2009, 04:10:52 PM »
Jason:

You are right -- the potential for something really good could have been accomplished at Pine Hill. Like I said before -- there are a few holes of note but it suffers because of the ho-hum nature of so many others.

#9 and #10 are both well done and two of the best public back-to-back par-4 holes you can play in NJ.

Tags: