On a previous visit I was shown a layout plan that had Jim's routing, plus two other club generated routings superimposed on top. I don't know what is going to emerge, but it will be hard to make the best use of the land if compromise is being sought at every turn.
What is very clear is that squeezing the new 1st hole between the existing 1st and 10th does not work very well. It is too tight to fit another hole in the gap. From what I saw recently it looks as though this is what will happen.
The new routing is certainly going to be a tough, long walk, with some big gaps between holes. It has to cross over from the east of the 11th green to the west of the 17th at some point.
It is incredible terrain and I can't help but think how good it could be if the new holes were linked in with the back nine, rather than trying to squeeze a third nine hole loop in. Clearly, having three loops will give lots of options, but the way in which the new 1st is being squashed in is an unfortunate compromise to provide a rational commercial benefit.