David,
I think people of your ilk cling stubbornly to past grievances because it is easier than admitting that racism is finally in the rear view mirror and getting smaller by the minute . . . . .
Gib,
You might have missed the real angle of my attack when I said the sponsor can ask whomever he damn well pleases. My suggestion of a minority in every tournament including the Masters was to note that sponsors are allowed the opportunity to pick a few favorites to be included in the field.
For example, a friend of mine gained entry into a couple Nationwide events by being the club champion of the host course. Let's call that the "I can beat hackers" exemption. In another case, a friend of mine is granted exemption into a Nationwide event because his college teammates father is a top executive at the title sponsor. Let's call that the "I know a guy" exemption. Sometimes you will here of the club pro of the host course playing in the tourney. Let's call that the "I am the guy" exemption. Then there's the John Daly type exemption. We'll call that the "I sell tickets" exemption. Then there is of course Annika and Michelle. We'll call that the "I sell tickets AND I'm a novelty" exemption. At the Masters, the US Am, British Am and US Am Publinx winners are invited. We'll call that the "I'm gonna be somebody" exemption. Then of course there's the US Am Runner up. That would be the "I'm ALMOST somebody" exemption. With the Mid Am winner exemption that would be the "I could have been somebody" exemption. Of course, there is also the special foreign invitation, this year given to Ishikawa of Japan. This would be the "I'll help grow the audience" exemption. Then, just to end this charade on a high note, my personal favorite, the lifetime champions exemption, a/k/a "I used to be somebody" exemption.
The last I checked, for a regular tour event the sponsor could give out 4 exemptions to current tour players too low on the priority list to get into the tourney, plus 4 exemptions to WHOMEVER THEY DAMN WELL PLEASE (oh, he/she SHOULD have the game to justify this also, presumably a +2 handicap or better).
Now, my suggestion that a black or minority SHOULD be invited to every tournament might have been a LITTLE less than 100% sincere, but I am 100% sincere in suggesting that they COULD probably be as deserving as the current list of special exemptions. Let's re-summarize the list:
1. I can beat hackers
2. I know a guy
3. I am the guy
4. I sell tickets
5. I sell tickets AND I'm a novelty
6. I'm gonna be somebody
7. I'm almost somebody
8. I could have been somebody
9. I'll help grow the audience
10.I used to be somebody
And lastly.......
11.I'm a minority and could help grow the game.
You are 100% CORRECT, that pesky #11 is a real insult to the first 10 on my illustrious list of deserving special exemptions. God forbid taking Gary Player's or Larry Mize's spot at the Masters given their ability to be competitive. My friend who was the club champ? He shot +14, +16 to miss the cut both years.
For the record, I'm a conservative who believes affirmative action does more harm than good in the world. Yet we ARE talking about a game, paid largely by sponsors who, for their investment of millions ask a few favors, including, "Can I invite a few players of my personal interest?" Given that scenario, and the rules which say 4 of their invitees can be "WHOMEVER THEY DAMN WELL PLEASE", I say "Sure, how about the guys in category 11 occasionally?!"
Oh, and about me clinging "stubbornly to past grievances"? Uhhhh, you've got the wrong guy!