Mike,
I had decided that I wasn't going to reply on this thread again as I respect everyone's right to their opinion on the subject, but your statement , "Phil, I'm truly incredulous here... I asked a few simple questions about how many times we know Tillinghast sailed abroad prior to 1900 and your answer was a complete dodge of the issue. I pointed out the flaws in doing the needle in a haystack digging for manifests and yet you cling to some belief because Tillinghast's formerly unknown 1890 trip on the Aurania probably wasn't where he had ship trouble (although there was a famed story of that same ship having trouble a few years prior), that somehow "Far and Sure" despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, is still not Tillinghast!" requires an answer and hopefully you'll better appreciate where I am coming from on this subject.
From MY PERSPECTIVE, I see the following two posts:
#38 - "On August 18th, 1890, Albert W. Tillinghast arrived in NYC with his parents from Liverpool on the ship Aurania. No word yet if that ship had trouble around Newfoundland."
#40 - "Scribner's Magazine, in 1891 in an artilce titled "Safety On The Atlantic" wrote;
"A few years earlier, when the (Cunard) Aurania was approaching land in a fog, the passengers who were smoking their after-dinner cigars suddenly saw looming above them, and above the topmasts, the cliffs which were supposed to be many miles away. The captain was far out of his reckoning, but was going so slowly that he was able to back into the Channel with slight damage."
Let's compare this to Far and Sure's account 22 years later;
"A number of years ago your correspondent was a passenger on a crippled ocean liner, and for nearly a week we had been making but little headway under sail. For several days we had lost our bearings and a fog that could almost be cut in half with a knife had settled on us. At last it lifted and we found that we were quite close to the Newfoundland coast, and we finally made the harbor of St.John for repairs."
"Far and Sure" was most definitely Albert Warren Tillinghast...
The last piece of the puzzle has been found and in the words of Sherlock Holmes, "Case Closed"!
Mike, you declared that the "Aurania" was the ship, that the August 1890 voyage that Tilly was on with his parents (and this is a GREAT find) was the ship that had the problems described in the F&S article and that therefor the CASE WAS CLOSED!
This is far beyond asking "a few simple questions about how many times we know Tillinghast sailed abroad prior to 1900..." which question, by the way, I never dodged at all. I answered definitively supplying all that has been KNOWN up till now. I thanked you for the information about what you discovered on the 1890 manifest and even sent it along to the family noting what YOU had discovered!
The problem with your declaring the "Case Closed" is that it wasn't and isn't. I was able to prove that Tilly's trip on the Aurania in 1890 was definitively not the one that F&S had written about and that the Scribner's article referred to an incident which occurred during it's maiden voyage in 1883.
Your response? A 15-year old Tilly may have made up a fanciful story based upon hearing passengers who were actually on board when it happened talking about... C'mon now. Even in jest, which is what I am hoping how you meant it, that was ludicrous to state. By doing so you appear close-minded to any criticism of your theory & it's proof, the very thing of which you accuse me.
In each and every instance where you have brought forth "proof" of the theory I have raisedwhat I believe to be reasonable arguments to refute them. That you disagree with them is fine and proper, but your statement that "So, I have to conclude that your mind is clearly made up here and nothing that is presented will shake your beliefs..." is only partially correct.
Yes, my mind was made up on this point before it was ever raised. Yes, it is still made up despite what has presented and my beliefs certainly haven't been shaken, not even a slight tremor. NO, I repeat, NO my mind is not closed and that I am VERY willing to accept and agree that F&S was Tilly, but ONLY when irrefutable proof can be given.
That this is so should be able to be seen in how I can laugh at myself for not thinking and mixing up "Joe Bunker's" statements on Pine Valley with F&S. Oh weel, I made an oops. What is ironic in this is that "Joe Bunker" was another person who was claimed by many to be Tilly which I at first agreed with and then, after discovering the Pine Valley reference, changed and both disagreed and was able to disprove it.
By the way, the family is thrilled to learn about this trip. also, back when the Merion ship manifest "discussion" was playing out, I, too, searched ancestry.com for records of a Tillinghast voyage prior to 1895 and there was nothing listed. That is also one of the reason's that I believed that the family history of Tilly first going abroad in 1895 was accurate and correct. With what you've discovered it appears that ancestry.com has added to their database...
Hope this helps and no hard feelings buddy...