Zowie Andrew! That pic of 5 illustrates the point brilliantly. Do you see the low bush area coming out from the right? The fairway used to go around this area. Those trees down the right have all grown in. It seems a pity since Colt would have had to tear trees out to build the course and afford interior vistas. I think something like 2300 sellable trees were originally marked for removal, but 10X that went in the end. That bush in front of the tee is between the old men's tee and the forward tee. I am sure I didn't play from the tees in this pic. Is there a tee over by the mower?
I think that mower is on the 4th green. I don't recall any other set of tees than the ones in the picture.
This pic really shows how different the 3rd would play with a tee over by the left tree line. While driving the hole is very difficult today, imagine having to cut a ball back against the mini ridge and between the bunkers. The hole is clearly shorter from the left because that tree line is interupted by the 2nd fairway.
Do you mean a tee by the right tree line? I can't see a tee being any closer to the left tree line. I agree that might make a better hole. I like the third but it reminds me a lot of the second on the Blue course at the Berkshire which I think is a better hole.
I like Swinley a lot but like you don't love it in the way I like the two courses at the Berkshire which are less celebrated.
Mark
You are right, I meant to say right tree line for the 3rd hole.
Tony
It must be your read, I don't get the impression that the author wants to bestow all credit for the project on Colt. Clearly, money and a drive for membership, two important aspects of the club development, were not in Colt's domain. IMO the author is only trying to give credit where credit is due and he seems to think the golf course is all credit to Colt.
I don't worry about the time on site issues. It is clear Colt had ample opportunity to be on site, but does it really matter if he was off on other jobs whilst leaving instructions? I don't think it does.
Lynn
Yes, the 4th has been fooled with a few years back and I do think drainage was the issue. What really surprised me was seeing an old pic of the front right bunker there. It doesn't look anything like today. Its more or less a hole with a sloped grass face. No evidence of flash at all.
There is also an interesting bit about the size of the tees. Apparently, Colt didn't think there was much call for decent size tee areas because of the size and type of membership. The old Colt tee in front of the current 5th tee is meant to be fairly representative of the size of tees. Remarkably small!
Ciao