"It just seems like you "doth protest too much" the way I read these threads. Its only a barroom brawl because in your mind, this particular topic needs to be one."
JeffB:
I know, I do protest too much and I probably always will. But you love me anyway, right?
I have what I think is actually an excellent reason to continue to protest so much about Merion and what Moriarty is doing with it on here. Probably a couple of very good reasons.
One happened the other day with Wayne and me as we were talking to Ran on the phone. We said we felt the entire essay was just completely historically inaccurate, and Ran said: "What do you mean, it's very interesting and some rather important man just came up to me around Pinehurst and said he thought the website was wonderful because he read the essay and he'd certainly never realized that C.B. Macdonald routed and designed Merion East."
We both said: "Jeeesus, Ran, that is exactly the very thing we are trying to prevent on here!" Ran either said nothing or something like, "Oh, really?"
The other good example is how impossible it can be to actually rid the architectural history of a course of something misleading when it gets firmly embedded in enough peoples' minds long enough.
This 1910 story of Wilson going abroad in 1910 for seven months and coming home with reams of drawings and sketches and such and the idea that was his basis for being able to route and design and create Merion East is another great example.
At this point, I do not believe that story was even created within about 40-50 years of the creation of Merion East, but as we can see on these threads it is almost impossible to get it and the significance of it out of anyone's mind.
I just don't want to see the same thing happen with this Moriarty notion that Macdonald routed and designed Merion East or was the creative driving force behind it because he just wasn't. He didn't do anything like that with Merion East. I seriously doubt he even would've wanted to. I know he certainly couldn't have done it in about the two days he spent there.
So I don't want to see that story still hanging around the historic record of a great golf course a half century from now and to prevent that my inclination is to cut it off at the pass now. The problem is Moriarty just doesn't want to face facts or face reality because obviously he doesn't want anyone to see how wrong he is.