To all the people who said that what tee you play from should be based on your handicap:
Why?
Why should a player who hits an average drive 300, hits an average three iron 220, and can barely break 90 because he hits every club very crooked a quarter of the time and can't putt play at 6800 yards instead of 6000? He'll enjoy the round much more because he'll hit a variety of clubs, instead of either keeping his driver in the bag all the time or hitting nothing but wedges into greens. He won't slow play down any more than he would otherwise. His problem is that he has to search for his ball in the woods every few holes, reload a fair amount, and hit three putts on many holes, not that the extra length is bothering him.
Conversely, won't a very skilled player who can't hit the ball more than 220 yards have much more fun playing at 6200 than at 7000, even if he could scrape out a 75 from 7000 by excellent fairway wood play, a stellar short game, and sheer will? Shouldn't he get to experience the full range of shots as well?
While I think skill should make some difference, basing tee choice primarily on average distance (not maximum distance -- just because I crisped a five iron 220 once doesn't mean that I really can hit it more than 180) makes more sense to me.