I had the opportunity to play the Everglades Club in Palm Beach for the first time a couple of weeks ago. I had seen aerial photos of the property taken prior to Silva's restoration - the course that exists there now bears little resemblance to the aerial photo other than the basic routing. I am told some 1-200,000 cubic feet of fill was dredged to rebuild. It is obvious from that photo that little if anything substantial remained from Raynor's original design by 1985(when it was taken). Although short and extremely tight by modern standards, I found it to be a hell of a lot of fun to play. Several of the green complexes, most notably the punchbowl eighth and biarritz 14th, are breathtaking.
My question is - has anyone out there played Everglades both before and after Silva's work and if so, what are their thoughts. Also, and perhaps most importantly, since it is apparent that several holes were changed completely (such as the 1st which went from a 345 yrd par 4 to a 545 yard par 5 with the green moved some 200 yrds back and to the left- and the redan 4th which apparently did not originally cross water) should this be considered a "reinterpretation" as opposed to a "renovation". Just a thought.