Robert:
Interesting looking course -- it looks similar in some ways to Strong's Canterbury in Cleveland (site of '73 PGA won by Nicklaus), which relies less on length and more on its 14 (admittedly, some more severe than others) doglegs to test the player. Maybe a Strong trait -- doglegs vs. length?
Curious about the terrain on some of the doglegs -- holes like 6 and 12 obviously (assuming the adjoining wooded property is owned by the course) could have been straightened. But they'd be shorter, too, and I wonder if the terrain of those holes is more interesting as a dogleg than via the "crow flies" route, with perhaps less interesting terrain? Holes 3 and 10 look fairly obviously dictated by surroundings -- the tennis courts on 10, the lakes and nearby holes on 3. Holes 5, 8 and 18 (and the 6th as well) look to be pretty short, compared to some of the others -- are they playable with an iron/fairway wood to get to the corner? I'd be interested to learn more about hole lengths there.
In general, I tend to like courses with doglegs, because of the demands it puts on placing the ball correctly in the fairway and the "look" of the hole. A hole like 11 would have to be on some interesting terrain -- or feature some nifty greensite work or a cool green itself -- to hold my interest. Several of the doglegs look pretty cool, and the par 3s at first glance look pretty good, too? (Is 17 a par 3? How long??)