Dave, I am looking hard at the point of seeing one of the most exciting canvasses of golf I have ever seen, or hope to see, and am totally on board with the desired turf presentation. The concept of a motteled weave of turf species dominated by multiple cultivars of fescues, maintained on the healthy and strong edge of survival and hearty enough to withstand the climatic swings that will be experienced out there at BallyNeal are the palatte on which Tom Doak and Co. have given this amazing presentation of golf.
I am hoping that as time goes by, the grasses will become absolutely ancient looking, with textures of light greens and yellows motteled into weaves of tans and browns as fairways melt into native textures of seasonal color. The greens are fabulous already IMHO. Sure, there are some high and struggling spots on knobs and such. What the heck would one expect from turf that is not more than a year old?
But, what has been the experience with long term highly comprised turf swards dominated by fescues out there? Given the micro climate differences, still... can the turf evolve as we would all like it? Will the turf evolution perpetuate into a dominant situation where poa will overtake the more fragile fescue? Even if the maintenance plan is to go extreemly light on inputs of fert and irrigation (as light as botanically possible) won't the evolution be inevitable to a dominant species and cultivar that will require some sort of turf management practices that heretofor has not been discovered by those other superintendents out there that have and are trying to maintain the desired firmness and perpetuation of fescue areas.
I'm thinking of the early stand of turf seeded to FWs at SHGC which were fescues, and what and how it inescapably evolved through winters and other climatic impositions to poa and softer than conceived of surfaces - in spots. I'm thinking of the original wide surrounds of fescue (that are a feature that Wild Horse shares with BallyNeal), where the onslaught of climate and stress has worked to soften and give way to the unavoidable transition to the more dominant species, which do soften from the original concept.
Wild Horse (which I did recently see on this trip) still functions pretty well as to what the surrounds are supposed to do. But, they aren't like they were 5 years ago.
As to fairways, Wild Horse went with dwarf blue in the FW from the start. It works there beautifully, but I wouldn't want to see it at BallyNeal, because it doesn't fit in the overall concept. It is a great surface to play from. Their blue FWs are greatly more maintainable (I don't think there is much arguement on that) and it stands up to the stresses of many more rounds played and carts constantly driven there. Bally is not, and should not be that. But, can the line be held and maintained at BN as conceived? I'm rooting for such. I can't say enough about the conception and marriage of the design team and turf maintainace program, and their goals. BallyNeal is the new gold standard, IMHO.