Tony,
Your post contains a grain of truth, but I couldn't disagree more with your dismissal of Jim Finegan's books. It's true that he's not one to rip a golf course, and has been known to err on the side of kindness. I don't always agree with his assessments, either--Jim prefers the Burnside course at Carnoustie to the Championship links, which I think is a bit daft.
But that's really beside the point. This isn't the Confidential Guide. What Jim does better than almost anyone is convey the joys of golf--the unexpected pleasures and curiosities of travel, the portraits in miniature of golfers he meets along the way, the thrilling landscapes we encounter in GB&I.
I'd be hard-pressed to think of a person who loves the game of golf more than Jim Finegan. From a distance, I realize that can come across as saying something like "No son loved his father more than Tiger Woods", but Finegan's passion for the game comes across instantly, and it's infectious. I think that comes across in his writing quite well. Put him on a golf course and this is a guy who to this day, in his late 70s, turns into a kid discovering the joys of the game for the first time.
There are harder-hitting critics out there, I'll give you that. Personally, I like it when I disagree with his take on a course, because his perspective is that of an avid, experienced golfer, not a professional architect. I can relate to that. (Not to say that I haven't worn out my copy of the Confidential Guide, too...) And instead of drawing the conclusion that he lacks insight, I try to figure out why this outlier occurred. Is it an architectural difference, experiential, or something else?
I deal with golf writers and golf stories every single day, and I can't tell you how much bad, joyless stuff there is out there. Jim Finegan is one of the best of our time. Whether it's something as small as describing the lunch at Muirfield to something as grand in scope as capturing the experience of Cruden Bay (a course he was out ahead of the curve in championing), Jim ALWAYS puts the reader in the picture, and does so with humor and grace. That is not as easy as it looks, and it's impossible to fake.
I'd take him over a sharper-tongued critic any day, because the guy can WRITE.