John,
I wrote up a review of the course when it first opened/finished construction. You can find it in the archives here if you know how to use the search tool. The one thing I thought that held the course back was the continued use of the same style green complex with an angled green going one way or the other with a bunker on the inside corner.
I thought the 8th, the only par three without water, was the best of the bunch, but could have been so much better if they would have used an original green design instead of repeating the same angled green that had been used all around the course. Absolutely loved the bunkering short of the green. When I first saw it I said, WOW! and was afraid to hit the shot. When I got up to the green, I was mildly disappointed with what could have been.
There was some variety throughout the round otherwise, but looking back, there were continued similarities throughout the routing. The eleventh was a par three, but the terrain would have made for a great risk/reward par four by moving the tees back 100 yards. At the time there was room to do this, whether it still has that room or not I don't know.
12 looked great, but with the carry over the water and the center bunker in the same line, it almost took the agressive line out of play unless your ball doesn't run after it hits the ground.
But to be honest, the first hole is a great opener that tells you what to expect on the way around. I loved it. The 2nd reminded me of Muirfield Village many years ago. The 3rd was a good short par four. The risk/reward on the 7th was nice. The 15th (I think) had a great green setting.
A lot of pluses about the course, but some lost opportunities I felt. My recommendation, drive five miles up the road and play Purgatory. I feel it is the better course of the two, for no other reason than the much better and much more fun green complexes.