It’s so interesting to me that after all these nearly 100 years (1907 thru 2005) the strategies Macdonald built into his “Dream Course” still intrigue us ......... and the course may still not be “back” to where he eventually wanted it.
The Restoration of The National Golf Links:
My question, during the “restoration” process has been, “to what era are we are restoring the course to? - the early course?” - the middle years? .... (I’ll finish this thought below)”
The “restoration” the National during the Karl Olsen “era” sort of was directed toward the first Walker Cup years, mainly because the most photographic evidence were Walker Cup photos.
The restoration continues today - with the “blessing” of the administration, of course, all based on historical information for the most part - green expansion, fairway expansion, original sand-hill uncovering, total tree removal, bunker reclamation, et al
My question is this: If Macdonald continued to “improve” his course over the more than 25 years after it was first built, would the “best” the NGLA was (in CB’s eyes), was what the course was near the end of his tinkering? - the early 1930's?
And again:
It’s so interesting that after all these nearly 100 years (1907 thru 2005) the strategies Macdonald built into his “Dream Course” still intrigue us!