News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Tim Gavrich

  • Karma: +0/-0
Convex Bunkers
« on: November 25, 2005, 05:40:54 PM »
I played in a tournament at Toftrees Resort near State College, PA this past August, and encountered a convex bunker to the right of the 4th green--i.e. one whose middle is higher than its sides.  Does anyone here know how this came about, or if there are other instances of it?

Thanks
Senior Writer, GolfPass

ed_getka

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Convex Bunkers
« Reply #1 on: November 25, 2005, 05:47:10 PM »
I believe I remember seeing one on the Ross Memorial course up in Michigan.

There is an interesting bunkering approach at Bandon Trails to the right of #11 fairway. The bunker slopes down towards the pond to the right, and undulates as it goes, sort of like widely-spaced moguls on a ski slope.
"Perimeter-weighted fairways", The best euphemism for containment mounding I've ever heard.

Brad Klein

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Convex Bunkers
« Reply #2 on: November 25, 2005, 05:52:39 PM »
Other convex bunkers:

Short right side of the par-4 9th green at Inwood CC on Long Island, a Herbert Strong design restored by Tom Doak

White Bear Yacht Club, St. Paul, Minn., par-4 14th hole, mid-fairway bunker, also restored by Doak

Rhode Island CC, Barrington, R.I., par-4 first hole, left side of fairway, restored by Brad Faxon.

Tyler Kearns

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Convex Bunkers
« Reply #3 on: November 25, 2005, 05:53:49 PM »
Tim,

I believe GCA favorite National Golf Links of America features a number of convex bunkers, namely on holes No. 9 and 17. They are certainly not my cup of tea, and as hazards, the ability to putt out seems a contradiction.

TK

Peter Galea

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Convex Bunkers
« Reply #4 on: November 25, 2005, 06:02:17 PM »
Tim,

I believe GCA favorite National Golf Links of America features a number of convex bunkers, namely on holes No. 9 and 17. They are certainly not my cup of tea, and as hazards, the ability to putt out seems a contradiction.

TK

I seriously doubt that you will be putting out of any of the convex bunkers at NGLA.
« Last Edit: November 25, 2005, 06:04:27 PM by Pete Galea »
"chief sherpa"

ed_getka

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Convex Bunkers
« Reply #5 on: November 25, 2005, 06:10:51 PM »
#17 NGLA is convex, but more like a formalized sand dune than the bunkers I'm thinking of.
   Where on  #9 NGLA is a convex bunker, I'm having trouble remembering that one.
"Perimeter-weighted fairways", The best euphemism for containment mounding I've ever heard.

Tyler Kearns

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Convex Bunkers
« Reply #6 on: November 25, 2005, 06:12:14 PM »
Pete,

I have not played NGLA, and realize the convex bunkers I mentioned are not located directly adjacent to the green complexes. The statement about putting out of them was more general in nature, however, what feature at NGLA would prevent playing this stroke? Unmanicured sand?

TK

Tyler Kearns

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Convex Bunkers
« Reply #7 on: November 25, 2005, 06:16:21 PM »
#17 NGLA is convex, but more like a formalized sand dune than the bunkers I'm thinking of.
   Where on  #9 NGLA is a convex bunker, I'm having trouble remembering that one.

Ed,

The fairway bunker just beyond the pond on No. 9 are convex, as are two others in the right rough and the central hazard at the far end of the landing zone (4 in total). You can clearly make them out on page 108 of Mr. Bahto's book, "The Evangelist og Golf".

TK

Jeff_Mingay

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Convex Bunkers
« Reply #8 on: November 25, 2005, 07:27:50 PM »
Garden City also features some convex sand hazards.
jeffmingay.com

A_Clay_Man

Re:Convex Bunkers
« Reply #9 on: November 25, 2005, 07:49:14 PM »
Wild Horse # 5 is my favorite. The story on it's inception is priceless.

ed_getka

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Convex Bunkers
« Reply #10 on: November 25, 2005, 07:52:08 PM »
Adam,
   Don't keep us in suspense, what's the story? Inquiring minds want to know. :)

Jeff,
  Which holes at Garden City?
« Last Edit: November 25, 2005, 07:53:18 PM by ed_getka »
"Perimeter-weighted fairways", The best euphemism for containment mounding I've ever heard.

PThomas

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Convex Bunkers
« Reply #11 on: November 25, 2005, 08:20:28 PM »
I think there's one at Southern Dunes
199 played, only Augusta National left to play!

George_Bahto

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Convex Bunkers
« Reply #12 on: November 25, 2005, 10:48:29 PM »
There are any number of "sand hills" at National. (Sand hills are what Macdonald himself indicated and labeled them as such some of his detailed plans).

The Bill Salinetti and his boys have done a wonderful job carefully figuring it out and "exposing" them for over a year - all this according to the Macdonald plan(s).

No one ever figured out what they were before for they were overgrown with all sorts of grasses over the years and you couldn’t really see what the land form was. It was just an evolution of growth on those hills over the years much the same way the saplings grew into trees.

The sand hills look terrific now and will even look a lot better as they blend in more naturally with their surrounding areas.

(it is hard to keep them "bare sand" because in a few months the blue stem and fesques begin to grow quite quickly)

It is an another interesting feature of the complexity of the National.
If a player insists on playing his maximum power on his tee-shot, it is not the architect's intention to allow him an overly wide target to hit to but rather should be allowed this privilege of maximum power except under conditions of exceptional skill.
   Wethered & Simpson

Ian Andrew

Re:Convex Bunkers
« Reply #13 on: November 25, 2005, 10:50:54 PM »
Garden City still has one on the third

Patrick Mucci, was the first hole ridge a sandy ridge before ?

Travis asks for many "whins" to be built at various courses (CC of Scranton had the most).

Tyler, you can not putt out of them, think natural dunes and very fine sand.

Pat_Mucci

Re:Convex Bunkers
« Reply #14 on: November 25, 2005, 10:52:12 PM »
George Bahto,

I would imagine that GCGC's convex bunkers were the inspiration for CBM's creations at NGLA.

A_Clay_Man

Re:Convex Bunkers
« Reply #15 on: November 25, 2005, 11:04:17 PM »
Ed, Since winter is setting in, I'm hoping Dick Daley will chime-in and tell the story correctly. What else is there to do in Green Bay the day after Thanksgiving? If I recall, it does involves a disagreement in a collaboration. Just to whet alittle mo'.

George_Bahto

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Convex Bunkers
« Reply #16 on: November 25, 2005, 11:27:43 PM »
Patrick said: "I would imagine that GCGC's convex bunkers were the inspiration for CBM's creations at NGLA. "

I absolutely agree, Pat
If a player insists on playing his maximum power on his tee-shot, it is not the architect's intention to allow him an overly wide target to hit to but rather should be allowed this privilege of maximum power except under conditions of exceptional skill.
   Wethered & Simpson

Pat_Mucci

Re:Convex Bunkers
« Reply #17 on: November 26, 2005, 08:47:09 AM »
Garden City still has one on the third

Patrick Mucci, was the first hole ridge a sandy ridge before ?
Yes.

Don't forget the convex bunker to the left side of # 1 about 60-80 yards from the green.
[/color]

Travis asks for many "whins" to be built at various courses (CC of Scranton had the most).

Tyler, you can not putt out of them, think natural dunes and very fine sand.

Mark_Rowlinson

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Convex Bunkers
« Reply #18 on: November 26, 2005, 09:44:11 AM »
I walked over NGLA very early one morning this summer. The green staff (there seemed to be hundreds of them) were preparing the course for a handful of members to play.  Those conxex bunkers were raked by hand and some of them were enormous.  What a maintenance bill!

Jeff_Mingay

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Convex Bunkers
« Reply #19 on: November 26, 2005, 10:00:06 AM »
There's also a convex bunker at the 10th hole at Garden City, I recall.
jeffmingay.com