Toggle navigation
Home
Tags
Courses By Country
Feature Interview
Discussion Group
In My Opinion
Contributions
147 Custodians
Register
Login
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Search
October 24, 2024, 07:25:29 PM
News:
This discussion group is best enjoyed using Google Chrome, Firefox or Safari.
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Evan_Green
Newbie
Karma: +0/-0
Reflection Bay vs. Rio Secco
«
on:
November 02, 2005, 09:04:29 PM »
Speaking of Vegas golf,
If you had to split 10 rounds between these two courses, how many would you play at each (e.g. 5-5, 4-6, 3-7, etc.) and why?
Thanks
Logged
Kevin_Reilly
Newbie
Karma: +0/-0
Re:Reflection Bay vs. Rio Secco
«
Reply #1 on:
November 03, 2005, 12:18:15 AM »
Sorry, nothing to offer except this review and pics of Rio Secco (I think there is another name for this course floating around GCA
) from another site:
Las Vegas pics galore
Registration on that site required.
Logged
"GOLF COURSES SHOULD BE ENJOYED RATHER THAN RATED" - Tom Watson
Ben Cowan-Dewar
Administrator
Newbie
Karma: +0/-0
Re:Reflection Bay vs. Rio Secco
«
Reply #2 on:
November 03, 2005, 08:42:18 AM »
Rio Secco was not all bad, but the real estate really hurt it. The canyon holes on the front nine are fairly dramatic.
I like Reflection Bay, but have not played it in a few years and I do not know their real estate situation.
I would play 7-3 RB to Rs, but I would rather play The Falls than either of them.
Logged
http://www.cabotlinks.com
Jim Franklin
Newbie
Karma: +0/-0
Re:Reflection Bay vs. Rio Secco
«
Reply #3 on:
November 03, 2005, 04:02:23 PM »
I just played both a few weeks back and thought RS was better. Lots of homes now, but I thought a more interresting layout in better condition. The greens were substanially better at RS too. I had played both many years ago and would have been in the 7-3 RB-RS camp, but this last trip converted me to a 6-4 RS-RB guy.
Logged
Mr Hurricane
Print
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Tags:
Tags:
An Error Has Occurred!
Call to undefined function theme_linktree()
Back