Good luck, MikeC, because as you obviously know there are a number of advocates on here who will believe to their dying day that "GREEAAAT" and "FAZIO" is a total oxymoron!
Not me. I think Fazio has the stuff and the talent to do anything---all he needs to find is the clients to ask him to go in a particular direction.
Tom Fazio in architecture is probably exactly like the great actor who's just been completely type-cast in his career. It's not that he can't be versatile, it's just that because of what he's done for so long he's so type-cast that the big honchos and moguls don't send him particular types of scripts.
Cary Lichenstein started a thread on minimalism today. I said that some on here may not be that aware that there're basically two types of minimalism. Fazio has probably come very close to doing one type of minimalism well---eg moving massive amounts of earth where one can't really tell what was natural and what wasn't.
I'd like to see Fazio try to do the other type of minimalism and do it really well----basically be given a great site and to figure out how to use it all without moving much of anything.
Only problem is if there ain't a whole lot of money in that type of minimalism, and Tom F is the first to say that if there ain't a lot of money in it he's not that sure he sees the point of it!
Tom's even pretty good at rationalizing that type of thing too so it doesn't seem to be Gordon Geckoish ("greed is good"). You know what Tom says----he's got a lot of mouths to feed and a lot of charities to give to!
I look forward to your revue---but by tomorrow you may just be another one of those on here who "just doesn't get it!"