A couple of days ago in another thread, Robert Thompson posted:
"The most hysterical thing about the Scotsman story is that the writer took the Planet Golf ratings at face value and notes that Scotland's golf total only trailed Canada.
Of course, there are dozens of Golf Digest raters in Canada that vote on best new course in Canada, which may explain why so many
bland Canadian tracks ended up on the list. Of course there's some good ones too.... but only a couple compare with the best in the world."
According to Oxford bland means: "lacking strong features or characteristics and therefore uninteresting".
How can it be said that any of the following are uninteresting! They each have their merits and short-comings, but bland is hardly one of them.
1. National G.C., Woodbridge, Ontario
2. St. George's G. & C.C., Islington, Ontario
3. Hamilton G. & C.C., Ancaster, Ontario
4. Beacon Hall G.C., Aurora, Ontario
5. Highlands Links, Cape Breton, Nova Scotia
6. Redtail G.C., Port Stanley, Ontario
7. Capilano G.C., West Vancouver, British Columbia
8. Royal Montreal G.C. (Blue), Ile Bizard, Quebec
9. Greywolf G.C., Panorama, British Columbia
10. Banff Springs G.C. (Stanley Thompson), Alberta
11. Angus Glen G.C. (South), Markham, Ontario
12. Lynx at Kingswood Park, Fredericton, New Brunswick
13. Fox Harb'r Golf Resort & Spa, Wallace, Nova Scotia
We could certainly argue for other Canadian courses that could be on this list. And, we could argue the merits of Scottish courses versus Canadian courses, but it is very hard to see how anyone could say that any of these courses lack strong features or characteristics and therefore are uninteresting.
I happen to be a big fan of Scottish links courses because of the hard and fast ground they are played on, the quirkiness of the bounces and lies, the pot bunkers, the winds and the green complexes. However, I do appreciate our Canadian courses - the best of which I think are comparable to the world's best that I've seen. How many, and which ones, and whether they're within some artificial number of points of some other is a fools game.
But to say that many of the best here, even the ones on this list, are bland must be hyperbole.