As any architect evolves in his career, some ideals come and some ideals go. For instance, if he trys too much innovative stuff, and is beaten down time and time again by hapless critics, his style may well and truly change.For sake of a discussion on a present day's architect, I have picked High Pointe. Given what we have seen in Tom's subsequent work, and culminating with three big openings this year, how do you think Tom would build "High Pointe" if he was given the identical track of land today? What would be different, if anything?