Does the substance of post #110 following post #109 tell you why I've said a number of times that Tom MacWood's interpretations on here on various matters, research and otherwise, relating to golf architecture--eg his assumptions and conclusions---are either completely inscrutable or completely worthless?
I love to see some of the raw research material he posts on here, and I encourage him to continue to produce it---but intelligently interpret it? No way!
Wayne:
Maybe he still thinks I'm asking him to reveal some new "source" that proves Crump committed suicide, but I'm certainly not doing that. Are Tom MacWood's "ducks" his mysterious "sources". If so I guess they either aren't in a row or they have their heads sticking straight down in some pond and their asses in the air at the moment. I'm not asking him anything about "sources" that he feels might be injured by us on here which only serves to make Tom ill. I'm only asking him to explain why he thinks a Crump suicide (vs dying of poison from a tooth abscess) would have any significance to the way the Club looked at Crump vs Colt and their parts in that vein during PVGC creation.
As Adlai said to the stonewalling Russian ambassador in the Untied Nation;
"I'm prepared to wait for his answer until hell freezes over!"
On all that voluminous information on the details of the routing of PVGC that you mentioned I just supplied for him, I fully expect in a day or so he'll just take that information and tell me he already knew all that!