News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


TEPaul

Re: Courses an Architect must study
« Reply #25 on: February 16, 2003, 04:49:52 AM »
Phil;

Would you recommend architects study the "designed portions" of all five Bethpage courses or the routings or both?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

cary lichtenstein

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Courses an Architect must study
« Reply #26 on: February 16, 2003, 07:01:00 PM »
I'd suggest Whistling Straits, Cog Hill and the Summit..
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »
Live Jupiter, Fl, was  4 handicap, played top 100 US, top 75 World. Great memories, no longer play, 4 back surgeries. I don't miss a lot of things about golf, life is simpler with out it. I miss my 60 degree wedge shots, don't miss nasty weather, icing, back spasms. Last course I played was Augusta

Don_Mahaffey

Re: Courses an Architect must study
« Reply #27 on: February 16, 2003, 07:40:10 PM »
I wouldn't be surprised if the Doak course at Tx Tech becomes a must see for aspiring architects. From flat farmland to what looks to be a great golf course. Shadow Creek and TT are great examples of what can be done on a "poor" site with enough $$$.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

A_Clay_Man

Re: Courses an Architect must study
« Reply #28 on: February 17, 2003, 06:06:56 AM »
Ok Tom H, What did we do that made us memorable? Not that I'm not use to people coming up to me and saying "you're Adam aren't you?" "We played here together three years ago, do you remember?" Rarely do I, but sometimes...

As for our day at the creek, I have one regret and that was that we could've and should've communicated better. Gib had to catch a plane and I wanted to hit the road. But Tommy wanted to stay and go back out, if only for a tour.

I think this entire DG has suffered because of that mistake. As it was, we all rode back, dropped Gib off at McCarren and Tommy, Sheryl and I had lunch at the buffet :o :o

If I had a guess I'd say that they remember us for being big tippers with the least amount of effort put on us. Save for the guy that poured the Arnie Palmers in the bar. Or was it my rocky par on 18? :D


Mark was the consumate host and I'd give anything not to feel the way I did that day, but I choose not to wish my life away ;D
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

Jeff_McDowell

Re: Courses an Architect must study
« Reply #29 on: February 17, 2003, 09:28:59 AM »
All these big name courses are great, but I don't think you need to limit your studies to only the highest rated courses. I spent a day on a little known Ross course in Minneapolis (Woodhill) and was fascinated. Some of the greens at Woodhill are everybit as intriguing as #2. Great architectural features are easy to find if you look for them.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

Dan Kelly

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Courses an Architect must study
« Reply #30 on: February 17, 2003, 11:30:21 AM »

Quote
Some of the greens at Woodhill are everybit as intriguing as #2.

Not to mention: They have considerably fewer spike marks!

My guess is: You saw more greens than players that day.

Years and years ago, when I had a rich friend whose very rich father belonged to Woodhill and didn't mind if his son took his friends to play there, I got to play Woodhill a bunch of times. I don't recall ever seeing more than another player or two on the course.

Terribly wasteful, if you ask me.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »
"There's no money in doing less." -- Joe Hancock, 11/25/2010
"Rankings are silly and subjective..." -- Tom Doak, 3/12/2016

Jeff_McDowell

Re: Courses an Architect must study
« Reply #31 on: February 17, 2003, 12:37:00 PM »
Dan,

It is terribly wasteful. I have a friend that plays there once a year, and he says the same thing.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »