Mike Young,
I don't know the particulars, but, committing 3.5 - 6 million to any capital project in these times seems somewhere between irresponsible and reckless.
I'd categorize it as insanity, without the need for the qualifying words, "financial suicide"
I'd rather horde what capital I have, weather the current storm and reassess my needs and ability to raise funds when the storm has passed.
Any Board embarking upon a project of this nature should be questioned and challenged with an alternative slate.
I know a club that recently spent in excess of 1 million to redo the locker room and about 600 K to put paver bricks on top of their concrete cart paths. The proponents claimed it would attract new members.
Surprise ...... it hasn't, nor will it.
When was the last time that someone joined a club because the cart paths were pretty ?
Sometimes, the problem with a club with a large membership, is that substantive projects are couched in the all too familiar, " it will only cost X per member". While that's true, it's based upon the large number of members remaining static or increasing. However, that number can and probably will diminish, leaving a greater financial burden for those who remain, which will also happen on the operations end.
This is how organizations/clubs go into a death spiral
Fight the good fight, this is NOT the time to be cavalier with a voluntary organization's money
Kevin Reilly,
I agree with you.
This only feeds into the media frenzy of undermining consumer confidence, but, don't worry, all that will change on January 21st.