Late last Friday, on another thread, I shared some quick work I did to combine the most recent top 100 US courses from Golf Magazine, Golf Digest, and GolfWeek. A handful of comments and questions followed, both within the thread, and even more so via private messages. A few main questions arose, all of which I will address in this new thread.
First, I determined that it was appropriate to add a fourth source, the top 100 US courses from top100golfcourses.com. Personally, I reference their lists frequently, and find them helpful when traveling to a new state or country. Additionally, we received details on their methodology, which, in brief, is a proprietary algorithm based on their own panel of contributors. So, it will be added as a fourth source in the blended rankings.
Second, I was asked to point out, or even list “outliers,” which for the sake of this exercise will not take on its true statistical meaning. I did not perform any complex math in combining these lists. I simply gave equal weight to each of the four sources from 1 to 100. So, outliers, in this context, simply refer to things that stick out. This would include courses on only one list, or excluded from only one list. They’re really just aberrations that one could pick up by reviewing the list for a few minutes.
I find each list interesting and somewhat useful, and I don’t intend to comment here on the relative quality of one list vs. another. Of course, there is inherent bias in everything, so some of that may come through, but mostly I am just putting forth a blended ranking and then making a few observations on the data. Please let me know any questions or comments, especially if you have suggestions on how this might be made more useful.
So, I will post the data first, then a few observations I made while compiling the list. After adding the fourth source, there are now 147 courses that appear on at least one of the four lists.