On Chris Hervochon's impressive inaugural post he talks about the demise of the challenging short par-3 hole in today's architecture. I wonder about how many really great ones exist, even from the "Golden Age."
To me, a great 100-150 yards hole should have the following characteristics, in rough order of importance:
1. A clearly visualizable chance for a 2--if you hit the proper shot properly.
2. A very good chance for a 5, or worse--if you hit an improper shot, or fail to properly execute the proper shot, but the possibility of a 3 if a great recovery shot is made.
3. Exposure to the elements
4. Visual appeal.
Because of the shortness of the hole, the margin for error on criterion #1 should be very small.
In running through my mind all of the possible candidates for "greatness" of the holes I have played I find the list to be very, very short. Most candidates falter at the second hurdle. Some, like the 7th at Pebble Beach, or the 8th at Olympic or the 4th at Nairn are too easy to bogey. Some, like the 17th at TPC-Sawgrass are far too hard to par if your first shot is awry.
The only nomiations I have for this cartegory are, therefore, the following:
#3 Spyglass
#5 St. Andrews--Eden
#8 Royal Troon
#10 Royal Dornoch
I'll let you all know if #6 at NGLA mkaes the cut after I've (hopefully) played ther next month .
Any other nominations or comments on my criteria?