I do not think that you can judge any architecture without experiencing it. I know of one writer that writes about so called great golf holes by looking at pictures, and reading scorecards, but that is just plain irresponsible. In order to be great, a building must be great inside and out. Unfortunately, clubhouses get decorated and quite often, it is impossible to tell the flotsam from the jetsam. Shinnicock has a nice interior, but the thing that stands out most to me, is the image on the hill. The R&A is iconic in that sense. The HCEG clubhouse is by far and away the best that I have seen, and placed next to an Edwin Lutyens Building, it holds its own quite well thank you. I think that on a golf course, the exterior image is more important than the interior’s. Royal Troon, Royal Lytham, and Royal Liverpool are great structures, and while each could use work inside, the exteriors exude the concept of the golf clubhouse. I do not want luxury and expensive materials in a clubhouse, but I want to be able to see play occur on the course from a vantage point inside the club.