Listings like this are imo purely indicative.
They can however, be a useful tool for those wishing to explore different venues.
Of course they change if and when new courses of appropriate merit are built or yee oldies upgraded.
Regrettably I suspect some are influenced by commercial or business arrangements.
A couple of years ago someone took several different rankings and averaged them. This seemed to produce a somewhat more equitable overall ranking than the usual approach.
Atb
Hi Dai,
I used to do an average of 4 rankings on my website, that dwindled to 3, then 2 so I pulled it down.
I really liked Adam's Golf Course Architecture one which I included but it got a bit outdated with new openings. Golf Digest became a disaster and hasn't recovered - a World Top 100 which excludes courses in the USA is no good for anyone apart from the publishers and advertisers.
So I was left with GOLF and Top100. Averaging 2 lists isn't that interesting and frankly I have lost a little heart in the whole thing. I'm getting more cynical about the whole industry of rankings I'm afraid. Maybe I was ridiculously naive before.
However, I am looking forward to discussing the relativities on Te Arai North versus South with you over a cold beer in November!