Look, the model in the US different. Not better, not worse. UK members don’t care about exclusivity. They care about total cost. Good for them. Those in the US that belong to the clubs we are talking about believe the opposite. Nothing wrong with that. Good for them. It’s just the way it is.
There isn't a
model in the US vs a
model in the UK. It's written into the law. With respect, my entire point is that you can't say something is a "club culture" when that culture is mandated by the IRS.
The reason why I brought it up in relationship to Mr. Keiser, and his cultural influence, is exactly that
I was gobsmacked upon hearing that his exclusive Dunes club, and it's 110 members
are, in fact, welcoming to a nobody like myself. I know that he is carefully phrasing it, because they aren't actually allowed to just state it plainly. You should see the folks whose eyes light up when I tell them about clubs that I know are welcoming to visitors who reach out. I'm arguing that we should just legalize it, because there are plenty of respectful, genuinely good people who just don't know the shibboleths that we do.
I like clubs more than resorts, because it's nice to play along side the regulars, and in the way they do. I'd even argue that one of the reasons why American golf is so stroke play-centric is exactly that most players here will never have the opportunity to visit a club where foursomes or even match play is the normal game. I see Keiser's insistence on operating his clubs (public & private) more in the way Scottish clubs
are allowed to as being a very big deal. I just think many people realize don't quite realize that the "King of Clubs" (has he's called in the article) even wanting to operate his clubs this way is a
major cultural shift.