I like a blind par 3, but I like high-luck (high randomness) on a golf course.
To me, there is no more archetype of living/breathing a specific golf course, than simply by knowing the approximate pin position also knowing which club to pull and which the target line to play. It's knowing a hole like the back of your hand and playing it as if your eyes were closed. A blind par 3 is, in this way, always a locals/members hole and probably shouldn't exist on a resort course.
I can understand why many folks are not into them. Especially folks that play to a number, especially folks who prefer to explore golf architecture over a deep relationship with a few courses, and especially when the blindness is not caused by a beautiful land feature.
A blind par 3 where the pin can be spotted on the way to the tee (somewhere along the course) rewards the attentive player, but even a totally blind can have merit if the green has a distinct, defensible position to play to, e.g. a double plateau. The player can still be rewarded for playing a good shot, even if that reward is stochastically distributed across many rounds.
---------------------------
The blind par 3 I'm most familiar with is the 15th, Himalayas, at Sharp Park (
mapped here on the wiki and I suspect this is the hole Matt is referring to as well), but I don't know it well enough to just pull a club and hit. I don't see it as an exceptional hole, though it is one of the MacKenzie holes there. However, I've seen this hit-and-hope moment spark so much joy with higher handicaps, that I think there is merit even if it goes against the principals of golf that most of my lower handicap friends hold.