In a golf life, it's important to be honest with yourself about your goals. Which is more important - gaining a deep understanding of what makes great courses great, or the quest to see/play as many courses as possible (sometimes called "belt-notching" around here)?
There's no wrong answer, but it is important to note that these priorities are more or less opposed to one another. Most golfers opt for the second goal, whether by choice or by default.
I'd wager that 90+% of golf trips are of the sort where groups play a handful of courses once, rather than playing a couple/few courses multiple times each. Wanting to see as many different golf courses as possible in an area is an understandable impulse, but in many cases it's not the best way to cultivate a deep understanding of any particular course. You can glimpse it, but it's hard to fully grasp the excellence of a great course in one round.
A press trip to southwest Ireland in 2018 really crystallized this. The first two courses we played were Lahinch, then Doonbeg. Between Doonbeg's Americanized feel and its inferior design, I came away sure that I would much rather play Lahinch twice than each course once, because it'd be more worthwhile to me as a golfer to get to know Lahinch better, to play it with different hole locations and weather conditions, etc.
The other three courses we played were Dooks, Killarney (Killeen) and Tralee. I liked Killarney and Tralee plenty, but would I rather play them once each again on a future trip, or would I rather hang at Dooks for a few days and get to know that golf course and club better? Granting that I'm benefitting from hindsight, that one is a no-brainer.