David:
OUCH re Plum Hollow. Some day.....
Mike:
You are not alone in not seeing greatness in 15 at Cypress. A certain contrarian expat living in Scotland called it a simple wedge, where no one could ever make a double bogey. Having witnessed several doubles, I'd disagree.... But beyond that, it comes down to this: if DIFFICULTY is your main criterion for greatness of a par 3, then yes, #15 at CPC is not great. It is after all 135 yards at the most, the green isn't that small, the bunkers aren't that deep, and the ocean isn't all that close to any pin.
My take is that difficulty is typically not at the top of my criteria for greatness of any golf hole, although difficulty at the top extremes will always be considered (as it is on the next hole!). If a golf hole "moves me", as #15 most definitely does, due to the beauty, where it falls in the round, the historic things that have occurred there, the "fun" of the shot due to wind or nooks and crannies of a green, then it is a great hole. #15 at CPC has all of those things.
The two holes you mention at SH have all of those things as well, and #13 most definitely belongs in a conversation of great par threes. But comparing apples to apples, you have two long par threes and two short par threes on the back nines of these two courses.
Is 13 SH really a better hole than 16 Cypress?
Is 17 SH really a better hole than 15 Cypress?
Reasonable minds may differ, but I gotta go with CPC on each of those assessments, although it is VERY close and we are talking four fantastic golf holes.
You wanna discuss something where I doubt any of us will differ on the superiority of SH over CPC? Par FIVES.
TH
ps - to Patrick Mucci - good call re Yale - I believe you have me there also!