Didn’t it used to be the case that if you made your interest in becoming an ANGC member public, your chances of selection were delayed and/or eliminated? It will be interesting to see how this plays out for the PIF Governor.
Regarding Tour governance, would you remain on the board if the most consequential matter in its history was not shared with you as it was developing?
One thing I learned during the hearing is that the Tour seemingly had a 20 year arrangement with China. I did not hear Monahan and others rail against their human rights transgressions. Could it be because the Chinese weren’t poaching their players?
I understand why the Tour is pursuing the PIF deal (the existential threat) but all the backstories released today are not a good look for it.