I know when Fortune Bay decided to build their course, Giant's Ridge was behind it 100%. With their 2 courses, and the third 20 miles away, it made them a regional destination if nothing else. Fortune Bay adds gambling for something to do at night, as well.
As far as I can remember when the economy goes south a bit, golfers don't stop playing, even their once a year golf trip, they just try to reduce costs, so a drive to resort like those up in Northern MN, or through WI, or maybe Michigan for Ohioans, etc. tend to do even better.
This OP title doesn't convey where I thought this thread was going. I clicked to see if someone thought there were new architectural paradigms for these resorts. For many years, the model was a very pristine facility like Innsibrook down in Florida, off the top of my head. And, it has a variety of difficulties among the three courses. We know Pinehurst suffers a bit from No. 2 syndrome, i.e., everyone seems disappointed when their tee times are at the other courses, and they did try to up their game with the other courses there.
Will these, when it is time to renovate for other reasons, adopt the more rugged look of some of the golf only resorts or maintain their architectural heritage? Innisbrook and many others also have a surrounding residential component.
Will courses trend harder or easier?
We know the top resorts will always do well. It would be interesting (and perhaps essential for golf) to know how the other ones will best survive.