while we would enjoy Match play, it would take too long and further dilute the field.
And Tom, "telling players what to do" isn't what I'm suggesting, but rather offering an incentive in his contract, a win win for both parties.
"Hey DJ, instead of multiple vapid sponsor's appearances, we're prepared to rewrite your multi million $$ contract under the condition that if you are qualified, you play in the Olympics, or use best efforts to do so."
Worldwide exposure is worth something for Taylormade..
Match play could have easily been done for the Olympics if that's what the Powers That Be wanted, since pretty much all Olympic coverage is pre-packaged and they are cutting back and forth to other events and updates anyway. It's just not what the PTB want.
The whole part about sponsors might be more complicated than you realize. The Olympics are so controlling of their brand etc. that I don't think TaylorMade could say anything about the Olympics or use the rings in their ad, unless they are paying the USOC to be an official sponsor. I could not even put the word "Olympic" on my proposed plan for the golf course in Rio.
Surely DJ's agent has tried to figure out a way to make it worth his while, so one must assume they can't.
The whole conversation about bribing the players to play via sponsors is so far removed from the paragon of amateur sports that the Olympics were supposed to represent, that I don't really know what to say other than *ick*. And yes I know that was all a sham.
I do think the event ought to be reserved for players who actually want to go -- I liked Peter's idea for a qualifier but as explained the IGF's setup does not allow for that. Indeed part of the whole mess is that the IGF is trying to justify its own existence and get their hands on allocating some of that sweet sweet sport development cash, and the players can see that as easily as I do.