I am not sure what we are trying to accomplish with this thread? Just because a hole is pretty doesn't mean it is great or even good - I think we all know that. But a hole that is beautiful to look at as well as full of strategy/interest is most likely going to have an edge over a hole that is just one or the other. I am not sure how you argue with that unless you just want to debate.
Most people for example think the 15th hole at Cypress Point is beautiful golf hole and one of the best short par threes on the planet. If the same hole was surrounded by run down town homes instead of 250 year old Cypress trees and the ocean, would most people feel the same way? In theory it would play the same way so maybe they should
Furthermore, since the architect likely had no control over the town homes, his or her design shouldn't be penalized for them
Moreover, if the backdrops don't matter you can't fault the architect for building the hole in that location assuming the town homes were there before the golf hole!
Bottomline, beauty doesn't make a great golf hole but it sure as hell can add to it in a major way. Very few great golf holes (yes there are a few) are not beautiful to look at. I
n most cases, when you take everything into proper consideration, it very often is a beauty contest with the winner being smart and having a lot of personality as well