They say golf is a religious experience.....
It could actually be a prototype - save the club from its oversized clubhouse by turning it into a religious center, and perhaps even get some tax benefits out of it?
On topic, we did a master plan there years ago. The club had done 2 greens in house and they were terrible. Later, the club called Charlie Coody, the old PGA golfer from Abilene, KS to redo it to his own master plan. Neither mine nor his followed the Maxwell ideals.
I recall one of the old members dissing the Maxwell greens. It wasn't Perry, it was Press. He said Press was on site only a few days, and told his shapers, "Give me the 2 mounder here, 3 mounder there, and a few 4 mounders around the course." I.e., he had his 4-6 template greens and used them over and over.
Edit: According to Chris Clouser and his book the "Midwest Associate" Perry routed the course, but Press did construction. He says there were 11 template holes, the most of any of his later courses, sort of confirming the member's idea that he was using standard greens. Not sure of the accuracy of his characterizations as 1-4 mound greens, but that was his recollection.
It is a nice routing.
Also, it was one of the courses where I measured how much back to front slope was required for average golfers to hold greens. The 12th was one I measured and it was less than 1% and no one could hold it. 16 was about 1.33%, on a much longer shot, and it held fine, thus setting my concept of minimum 1.33% or greater on the back to front slope, adjusted a bit for downhill and downwind, when necessary.
Lastly, the 18th was a tweener 4-5, and I recall redrawing it about five times, prompting me to put a clause in my next renovation contract that concepts were limited to a maximum of three, although, the argued there were just 2 concepts, and they just changed their minds twice on each.....