I wish I could somehow 'compare' the subjective experiences of:
A - an average golfer, in 1937, playing Crystal Downs
B - an average golfer, in 2017, playing Streamsong Black
C - an average golfer playing Crystal Downs in 2017
D- an average golfer playing Streamsong Black in 2097
Or Streamsong Red and Augusta; or the Loop and Pasatiempo etc at those 3 times/eras - separated by 80 and then another 80 years
In terms of actual & lasting quality instead of immediate & perceived reactions, only the long view really counts/speaks the truth, or so it seems to me.
It's a bit of a shame how much early and intense scrutiny is today brought to bear on any new golf course, and with that the thumbs up or thumbs down of the rating panels.
Some new courses have benefited dramatically from this instant acclaim; but I think such fame may prove fickle, and such intense scrutiny-focus on reactions means that some examples of potentially lasting quality might not get the chance to breathe.