No need to rank them, but will note mine at Fortune Bay in MN rivals the one at Yale for depth of swale. So deep and shady, they take bets on when the ice in the valley will melt. That is on a short par 4, and frankly, I think they work better their or on a par 5 easily reachable in two.
I had another one on a long par 4 in Texas, very geometrical in the Raynor style, sadly NLE. I also have one on a par 3 is south Texas, but its not long enough to bring the running feature into play, so its just a different version of a two section green.
I am often told that "no one likes" those holes, to which I respond, "Well, its my favorite."