The position of the hole in a round can often have an influence on how we perceive a great hole -- for example ANGC 12, which might have had a bit less impact in the flow of the round as the 3rd hole it once was. I can think of quite a few great 12th holes. Also, many 16th holes, 17th holes, 11th holes, etc....
In the UK I think one can identify the two best 14th holes in the world, at St Andrews and Ganton. But I would struggle if asked to name many great 14th holes in America. This seems weird. A 14th hole should be occupying a key spot in the build-up of a round.... right? Why do so many seem like connector holes?
The best ones that immediately come to my mind in the USA are the following:
14th LACC North
14th Pebble
14th NGLA
14th Baltimore CC Five Farms (East)
14th Shinnecock
Thinking of some other "great" American courses and their 14th holes -- are any of them really outstanding compared to other holes on the course?
ANGC -- no
Cypress -- no
Oakmont -- no
WFW -- no
Pinehurst 2 -- no
Riviera -- no
Pine Valley -- it's famous, but that hole is pretty one dimensional
Merion -- could be, but there's so many stars at Merion outshining it
TCC -- perhaps
Lancaster -- a very nice Flynn hole, archetypal of the course
Is it just my imagination that the 14th as a species seems like an "orphan" hole? I'm thinking I've just got to be missing something, or leaving out obvious examples. Or, are there really awesome 14th holes out there that blow away those on the "headliner" type courses listed above?
If anyone thinks my observation is a "real" phenomenon -- then why? Are architects (consciously or subconsciously) tending to create a "breather" hole prior to a tough finish, for example?