Wind did have a very nice discussion in the World Atlas of Golf which was first published in 1976 or so. The title of his four page essay was ‘The imperishable genius of the master architects."
A few of the old courses were discussed in a positive manner. There was no mention of a specific post WW2 course except for the following general summary.
" How, during the affluent post-war period, when a good number of American architects were given the financial backing, time, land, and support (not to mention vastly improved grass strains, better irrigational methods, and all the rest of the advances in knowledge and technique) to build courses of championship standard, more often than not they funked it, chiefly because of their preoccupation with making as much money as possible, which meant becoming involved in as many as twenty projects simultaneously. Consequently, what should have been a Golden Age of Golf Architecture yielded little beyond that rhinestone jewel of a thought: the mistaken concept that a course over 7,000 yards in length is automatically a championship course - and that the first tour tournament played over it is automatically entitled to call itself a Classic."
Maybe funk was a typo and knowing his unimpeachable status as a gentleman, the L in flunked must have been dropped versus a mistyped C.
He had an opportunity to rave about modern courses but didn't include anything except for one small photo of Muirfield Village.