There was a Sirius radio discussion last Friday that raised the question if reviews were even relevant in this new age. The subject revolved around a just released movie, Suicide Squad that my children (tragically) want to see. The Wall Street Journal called it trash. On Sirius, they discussed the WSJ review, with one person quipping, 'Do you think that even one person who intends on seeing this movie reads the WSJ?!' The point of mentioning this is ... I wonder how worthwhile early reviews (like this one) are of The Loop?!
Most people will play the Red Course once and the Black Course once and then start typing. That's how it is these days - blast in and blast out. Lost in the shuffle could be quiet, intelligent designs such as Royal Worlington, Woking, Wolf Point and here. Places that don't offer flashy hazards, views of big bodies of water or other attributes that make them easy to photograph may suffer in this digital age. Nuanced experiences that require time and rounds to noodle over are STILL something to be cherished in our sport, yes?
With nothing to compare The Loop to and being on property less than 24 hours, a review has a dangerous chance of underestimating what was accomplished. That is true of all great designs but it is doubly true here. Cliché or not, The Old Course is the Queen of such golf. Rounds upon rounds need to be played over her to scratch the surface of her attributes.
I am still twisting things around in mind, wondering about this and that three weeks after playing The Loop. For certain, the place is prettier than I imagined: sandy soil, fescue grasses and quiet. Also, the land has more movement than advertised. Trying to compare the Black to the Red makes my head hurt. Tom doesn't even bother; he thinks of The Loop as one entity. That simplifies things and might also help one understand that it's on a different plane, something that doesn’t occur often in our staid sport.
Tom Doak puts in perspective – simultaneously - the bank to the left of Red 12 and short of Black 6. Such architecture is highly effective without screaming at the golfer. The irony is that the architecture isn’t in your face while the project (on the surface, at least) was daring. It must have been a Rubik's Cube to get each green built to accept shots from two different directions and have par work out satisfactorily. How impressive is the effort? Very, so hats off to Tom and Brian Slawnik, Brian Schneider, Eric Iverson, and Angela Moser.
Heading up there, I appreciated the obvious benefits to the savvy owner of such a concept. My one reservation was this: could a single (conventional) 18 hole course have emerged that was superior to what happened? Having seen it, I would say the answer is ‘no’ as both 18 holes are rife with fun golf with great holes sprinkled evenly throughout. I have a feeling that time will likely mark this innovative endeavor as something even greater than the sum of its parts. Indeed, more than any course I can think of, I look forward to reading reviews of this place 10 and 20 years from now.
Time - and lots of rounds - will help verify just how special what occurred here is. One thing is for sure: others will try something similar and it will make you appreciate The Loop all the more.
Here is the link:
http://golfclubatlas.com/courses-by-country/usa/the-loop/Best,