So which cities have great public, not resort courses?
From the Golf Digest list:
25. Chambers Bay- Tacoma
39. Torrey Pines- San Diego
From Golfweek:
TPC Scottdale, while it may be a resort course, it did receive public monies.
Laurel Hill, Lorton, VA, outside of Washington DC
Stevens Park, Dallas
Presidio, San Francisco
Murphy Creek, Aurora, CO (Denver)
What about the public courses in the Chicago area? Or Portland, OR?
The problem with big city, public golf is that the course will be crowded and beaten down, meaning not in great condition.
Scott,
Most of the courses that you have listed wouldn't qualify as "in the city" courses; they are part of a metro area. Approximating, here are some distances from Google maps:
10 miles from Tacoma to Chambers Bay
15 miles from San Diego to Torrey Pines
11 miles from Scottsdale to TPC, but 25 miles from Phoenix
21 miles from Laurel Hill to DC
21 miles from Denver to Murphy Creek
I think most large metro areas, including Atlanta, would have good to really good to great public offerings IF you expand to a 25 mile or so radius from the center city. But I think there are very few cities in which you would find "destination" golf in the interior.
Your last sentence, I think, is the really important one:
"The problem with big city, public golf is that the course will be crowded and beaten down, meaning not in great condition."
This begs the question, "A problem to whom?" Courses that are crowded are a good thing, right? And even when a course gets lots of play, it CAN be in good shape IF the super can throw enough money at it, but that would mean higher fees and/or higher taxes, and that is NOT a good thing.
At the risk of beating a horse that has already passed away, I'll say it again: The City of Atlanta public courses (N. Fulton, Bobby Jones, Browns Mill, Tup Holmes, et al) serve a purpose and have a pretty large constituency. That they aren't on anybody's Top 100 list is neither uncommon for the interiors of large cities, nor does it really matter.