Will MacEwen an I were talking about the 42 million dollar figure today. Just seems WAAY high. Does anyone know where the bulk of the costs came from? How much could the irrigation have been? Crazu interest rates on the note? Land should have been cheap.
First of all, you should never believe any numbers you hear in the golf business. Some are trying to impress you with how much they spent, and including charges that have zero to do with golf; others are trying to impress you with how little they spent, and "forgetting" major line items.
But it is surely possible that $42 million was spent if you include things like:
Land Costs
Engineering
Permitting [legal fees, etc.]
Cottage Construction
Road Construction
Power, water lines, etc.
Maintenance building
Maintenance equipment
Design fees
Management fees ... some people actually borrow money to pay themselves to manage the project!
I have worked on a few projects where the total tab was well north of $40 million, even though what I would call the "golf course construction budget" was less than $10 million.
The only part that's hard to believe is that they thought they could spend $40m and NOT go bankrupt.
P.S. I would be curious to see it because, as you probably don't know, we were the only other firm besides Rod Whitman who was interviewed for the job. Jim Urbina went up to look at the site for me; I was too busy with other projects at the time and didn't go. It seemed obvious they were going to settle on Rod, anyway, and I was happy to see him get the job. Of course, that was back in the days when there was plenty of work to go around!