I am absolutely scared to death about the possibility of Greg Norman's group performing an "upgrade" to Cobb's. I am also concerned that Norman's group is the only team that even had a look at it. How can Meadowbrook be so closed minded about history and course design? Also, how can they add the length where they need it? In going thru all the holes, I can see the possibility of lengthing the course but the holes that need it the most are the ones whose tee boxes are against fences, woody hills, or Karakung (holes 3, 4, 6, 9, 10, 11, 16). There are thousands like me who completely love the course in the exact form it sits today. Figuring Meadowbrook would not contact Hanse or Doak, I can only pray the deal does not go through.
Holes I Love:
2 - Short par 4, creek limiting drive, uphill heavily sloped back to front green.
3 - Very short par 4, creek running in front of green.
5 - Split Fairway along entire length (they should cut down that one tree that prevents going right of creek)
7 - long par 4, short par 5. Fantastic greens complex
9 - Short par 4, tee shot blind and uphill, green sloped sharp right to left.
10 - Short par 4, another blind uphill tee shot with blind shot to green (huge tall front bunker protecting green)
12 - One of the hardest holes in golf. Very long with a crazy sloped right to left green. Good luck getting par (4).
15 - Philadelphia golf at its finest. My favorite greens approach that I know of.
17 - Beautiful, down in the valley, downhill par 3. Great bunkering surrounding green.
Mike_Cirba:
What 12 holes on Cobb's are original or similar Wilson?
Thanks,
Joe