For what it's worth I also am not a fan of 18 and Jon's description of his reasoning fits mine exactly. It just doesn't look or feel like a hole that belongs on a links.
It looks and feels like a hole that belongs on an American course that wants to host a tournament ... the difficult par-4 finisher. There are some of these on links courses, but not many of them in Scotland, except for Carnoustie. Its lack of forgiveness is also a bit out of character for Kingsbarns.
Thanks, Tom, you've absolutely nailed what's wrong with 18. At Carnoustie 18 is completely consistent with what has gone before. At Kingsbarns it's like walking onto an entirely different course, in a different country.
Mark and Tom
I know that KB has tried to fix the 18th over the past few years (only partially successfully), but you are both right that it lacks a bit of je ne sais quoi, but here's my guess as to what the "sais quoi" is.....
If I were Art Dunkley, I'd think "Reverse 8th at Pebble!"
That is to say:
--get out the dozers in the fall and dig a chasm from 150-160 out from the green to the edge of tghe burn
--take the soil from that cut and use it to create a flattish bail-out area to the right side of the fairway (up close to the clubhouse), to which the timid could lay up for a 100-120 (but tricky and redanish) approach to the green.
--Fill the cut out area on the direct line to the green with gorse
Voila! Mediocrity turned into greatness!
Rich
PS--one of the saddest sights I have ever seen in golf was 2-3 years ago when one of the great stalwarts of the game, Michael Bollanack, hit a marvellous drive (for a geezer) on the 18th in the Dunhill Cup only to then be presented with an impossible downhill approach to the raised green. He tried, valiantly, to execute the shot, but ended up in the burn and eventually picked up. Never again!
rfg