News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


A.G._Crockett

  • Karma: +0/-0
Best golf course spoiled by housing
« on: August 14, 2003, 09:33:49 AM »
The thread about the best golf development with housing got me to wondering about the converse.

What great golf courses suffer the most, in rankings or otherwise, from the intrusion of housing.  Assume that the sale of real estate is part and parcel of the whole process most places in the early 21st century, but where has it been done the worst on an otherwise great course?
"Golf...is usually played with the outward appearance of great dignity.  It is, nevertheless, a game of considerable passion, either of the explosive type, or that which burns inwardly and sears the soul."      Bobby Jones

Tommy Williamsen

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Best golf course spoiled by housing
« Reply #1 on: August 14, 2003, 09:43:18 AM »
Sycamore Hills in Indiana
Where there is no love, put love; there you will find love.
St. John of the Cross

"Deep within your soul-space is a magnificent cathedral where you are sweet beyond telling." Rumi

THuckaby2

Re:Best golf course spoiled by housing
« Reply #2 on: August 14, 2003, 09:51:54 AM »
One very obvious answer:  Pasatiempo.  Remove the housing and it moves up the rankings at least a little bit, I'd dare say.

Not that that's ever going to happen....

TH

John_Conley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Best golf course spoiled by housing
« Reply #3 on: August 14, 2003, 09:59:06 AM »
Haven't played it, but isn't Wild Dunes in SC a lock for this honor in the U.S.?  

JohnV

Re:Best golf course spoiled by housing
« Reply #4 on: August 14, 2003, 10:08:22 AM »
PGA West - Stadium.   The houses on the sides feel like sky boxes at a tournament, all looking down on you.

Jim Franklin

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Best golf course spoiled by housing
« Reply #5 on: August 14, 2003, 10:09:57 AM »
I gotta go with Mr Huckaby on this one. Pasatiempo would soar IMHO if the houses were not there. They just totally diminished my enjoyment of the place.
Mr Hurricane

DTaylor18

Re:Best golf course spoiled by housing
« Reply #6 on: August 14, 2003, 10:11:29 AM »
It's been a while since I played Wild Dunes, but I do remember seeing a lot of houses and condos everywhere, which is a shame since there are some beautiful views.  However, 17 and 18 are the two most stunnign holes, and there are no houses I remember blocking those views.  

Pasatiempo certainly could be improved with less housing, but as someone who hates housing on courses, i was shocked how little the housing there really bothered me.

mike_malone

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Best golf course spoiled by housing
« Reply #7 on: August 14, 2003, 10:13:35 AM »
 Merion
AKA Mayday

Joel_Stewart

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Best golf course spoiled by housing
« Reply #8 on: August 14, 2003, 11:49:26 AM »
Half Moon Bay in California.  I played the course in the early 70's when there was no homes and it was just sand dunes and ocean.  Now you can't see the ocean until the 18th hole and all the sand dunes have been paved over.  Very sad.

Also Troon - Monument in Arizona.

DTaylor18

Re:Best golf course spoiled by housing
« Reply #9 on: August 14, 2003, 11:51:57 AM »
Yes, Troon North's housing was awful, it was everywhere.

Jeff Fortson

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Best golf course spoiled by housing
« Reply #10 on: August 14, 2003, 11:54:03 AM »
Pasa and PGA West Stadium are my two.

Jeff F.
#nowhitebelt

THuckaby2

Re:Best golf course spoiled by housing
« Reply #11 on: August 14, 2003, 11:56:24 AM »
Joel:

WHOA!  I never played HMB-"Old" without the houses, and I always cursed it as too much "condo-canyon" golf... I can't even imagine it with no houses, it must have been really, really cool.

But that one would have to take the cake.  Great call.

TH

Jeff_Stettner

Re:Best golf course spoiled by housing
« Reply #12 on: August 14, 2003, 12:00:24 PM »
Southern Dunes. Fun Smyers course where the golf holes are all elevated above the surrounding homes so golfers can see clearly into the backyards of the residents. Each tiny home had a tiny pool. Each tiny pool had a not-so-tiny couple of folks wearing clothes that were far to0 tiny.

Mike Benham

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Best golf course spoiled by housing
« Reply #13 on: August 14, 2003, 12:08:02 PM »
It's been a while since I played Wild Dunes, but I do remember seeing a lot of houses and condos everywhere, which is a shame since there are some beautiful views.  However, 17 and 18 are the two most stunnign holes, and there are no houses I remember blocking those views.  

Bingo ... unfortunately, the hurricane a few years back did more damage to the course than the Big Bad Wolf did to the houses ...
"... and I liked the guy ..."

Mike Benham

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Best golf course spoiled by housing
« Reply #14 on: August 14, 2003, 12:18:03 PM »
One very obvious answer:  Pasatiempo.  Remove the housing and it moves up the rankings at least a little bit, I'd dare say.

But let's ask this question in regards to Pasa, how many of the houses were there when the course was routed?  (I don't have the history of the project memorized ...).

It's obvious that most of the houses weren't built in the 1920's, maybe none of them, so were there limitations on the property that required holes 6, 7 and 8 to be so close together?  Put an extra 20 yards between those 3 holes and you eliminate the biggest black eye against the course.

Other than 16, and just maybe the 11th fairway, I don't see many holes where the housing we see today impacted the layout of the holes.

As the photo shows, not many houses in the background on opening day ... ps:  that's little Huckaby in the white knickers doing NCGA rating ...

http://www.pasatiempo.com/home/images/openingday3.jpg
« Last Edit: August 14, 2003, 12:32:33 PM by Mike Benham »
"... and I liked the guy ..."

THuckaby2

Re:Best golf course spoiled by housing
« Reply #15 on: August 14, 2003, 12:28:45 PM »
Oh man, that is classic....

As for Pasa, yo no se, mi amigo.  All I am picturing is that course with zero houses, and it would be an improvement in my mind's eye.  But you know where my mind's eye got us re the bunkers on 15....  ;)

TH

Michael Whitaker

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Best golf course spoiled by housing
« Reply #16 on: August 14, 2003, 12:32:31 PM »
Wild Dunes, hands down. Between the hurricane and over-building this course has experienced the most dramatic change (good to bad) I have ever seen for a property. The first time I saw the course it played through a maritime forest. Then Hugo hit and tore out all the trees. Then, the developers took over and built something on every available square inch of property cleared by the loss of trees. It broke my heart when I saw the over-building. Wild Dunes is still a wonderful course, but it retains only 20% of the visual experience it used to have... 30% was lost to Hugo, 50% to development.

DTaylor18 - 17 & 18 have houses and condos down the right side and 18 now has a massive high rise directly behind the green!

Jeff - I agree with you about Southern Dunes. I've never seen so many tiny pools, all lined up like Lego blocks. Fortunately, I didn't see the tiny-clothed people!
« Last Edit: August 14, 2003, 01:56:32 PM by Michael Whitaker »
"Solving the paradox of proportionality is the heart of golf architecture."  - Tom Doak (11/20/05)

A.G._Crockett

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Best golf course spoiled by housing
« Reply #17 on: August 14, 2003, 12:42:09 PM »
Michael Whitaker
I haven't played Wild Dunes, but would Tidewater at Little River, SC be similar in terms of looking at the before and after of the housing, and wishing it was before?  I think the housing has really hurt Tidewater in the rankings in recent years, when compared to the buzz when it opened.
"Golf...is usually played with the outward appearance of great dignity.  It is, nevertheless, a game of considerable passion, either of the explosive type, or that which burns inwardly and sears the soul."      Bobby Jones

Michael Whitaker

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Best golf course spoiled by housing
« Reply #18 on: August 14, 2003, 01:55:14 PM »
AG - I haven't played Tidewater in about four or five years. The last time I was there I don't remember noticing a major problem with housing. Obviously, they have built a lot since then.

Wild Dunes is just ridiculous. Everywhere you look there are condos and beach houses... it's really sad.
"Solving the paradox of proportionality is the heart of golf architecture."  - Tom Doak (11/20/05)

Carlyle Rood

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Best golf course spoiled by housing
« Reply #19 on: August 14, 2003, 02:13:34 PM »
In my opinion, Pasatiempo is probably one of the most important (most underrated) residential golf developments of the 20th century.  Apparently Thomas Church lived there for a brief time and it's likely that Pasatiempo had a significant impact on his landscape design.  Church helped develop the idea of the indoor and outdoor spaces merging with one another.  It may be one of the most important innovations in landscape architecture in the last century.

Notice how seamlessly the homes' backyards blend with the surrounding terrain (relative to other residential developments).  Contrast that with the "monument" homes beside the most exclusive residential golf developments today--or the "condo country clubs" all over the South.

My wife and I toured the development after I played there this Spring (with Huckaby of all people--traitor   :) ) and we took a few dozen photographs.  I shared them with my professors at UGA and many were sufficiently impressed that they are seriously considering adding it to their semi-annual West Coast field trip.

I should probably post some of those photos too.  I only put the golf course shots on my web site.

THuckaby2

Re:Best golf course spoiled by housing
« Reply #20 on: August 14, 2003, 02:17:07 PM »
Carylye:

You are right on, obviously.  As housing developments go, Pasa is a great one, WAY WAY WAY better than most if not all done these days.

BUT.... the houses still do "ruin" what otherwise might be one hell of a scenic golf course.

See, no houses would have also meant most likely no trees...

Picture it as a wind-swept, open plain, what it likely was before any development.

THAT would make for one hell of a golf course.

Not that it's not now, it would just be better without the houses.

That's my convoluted take.

TH

mike_beene

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Best golf course spoiled by housing
« Reply #21 on: August 14, 2003, 05:07:20 PM »
Pebble.Maybe not spoiled,but think of it without it.

Jeff_Brauer

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Best golf course spoiled by housing
« Reply #22 on: August 14, 2003, 05:17:12 PM »
I agree with the Wild Dunes idea.  I had a certain impression of the course based on the original cover of the "Golf Course" by Cornish and Whitten and was sorely dissapointed at the damage of developers and hurricanes.  The housing corridors are simply too tight.

My impression of Pasa was that it was always a housing development course.  I could be wrong, but if not, then it is probably the first course to have its corridors squeezed.
Jeff Brauer, ASGCA Director of Outreach

Jason Mandel

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Best golf course spoiled by housing
« Reply #23 on: August 14, 2003, 10:40:12 PM »
Agreed for Tidewater, even though this is still my hands down favorite in Myrtle, the housing defintely takes away from the experience.  

Tidewater was one of the few golf courses i played, that without expecting much going into it, walked off the 18th hole and went back out for another 18 without even thinking about it, i havent played it in probably 5 years, but it still remains fondly in my memory.
You learn more about a man on a golf course than anywhere else

contact info: jasonymandel@gmail.com

Tyler Kearns

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Best golf course spoiled by housing
« Reply #24 on: August 14, 2003, 11:18:07 PM »
Capilano. It is such a majestic and magical place, the close proximity of the housing around the course detracted from the experience. It is not on par with the situation at Pasatiempo, huge evergreens make hitting houses almost impossible; but they can still be seen!! Without the houses, Capilano is heaven!! No exaggeration.

Tyler Kearns