I'm thrilled that someone who gets as much press as Trump is using an architect like Hanse in his big projects. But I'm reserving my final judgment of the new and improved Donald until after we see how he operates Fort Apache Ferry Point.
What I'm most curious to see is how much favoritism tax-paying residents will receive over non-residents when it comes to, not just cost, but to availability and accessibility of tee times. The Bethpage model is fine, but with the amount of city tax dollars that have gone into the project, I wouldn't even bat an eye if non-residents had to be accompanied by a resident on weekends (or barred from weekend play all together).
Taking that even further. Are ALL residents created equal? What about some kind of priority membership or weekend men's league option that, yes, favors someone like myself over other city residents who play golf infrequently and without as much dedication? If these options don't have increased cost, they simply require full payment up front, is it still unfair or undemocratic? What if these options are only open to those not currently members at other clubs and courses?
Am I completely out of my tree?