This is an EXCELLENT example of why golf course rankings are such b.s. John is normally a very observant guy, but he hit a bad tee shot on this hole in his one play, and really does not understand the hole at all ... he did not even see the central bunker, or get any appreciation for the different angles of approach and how they interact with the contours of the green. Nor does he have any sense of the fine line between not getting far enough up the right side, and going too far and leaving yourself in the rough up top, with a bad line to the green past the right bunker and right into the back bunker.
So, therefore, he rates the hole as not as good as a hole on one of his favorite courses, that he knows 100x better.
Raters miss a lot, but they usually won't admit it.
As to this hole, I like it a lot, but I think John underrates the Ballyneal hole as well. Difficult to compare a good short 4 and a good par 5, as with the respective first holes, but I don't see giving both 1 AND 4 to Dismal over Ballyneal. In fact, if you compared the first of each course to the fourth hole of the other, we would probably just have a bunch of 10-10 even rounds to start with.
I'm having fun sharing my thoughts, and using the golf holes to state some of my favorite principles adopted over the years. I'm noticing my own biases as well, striving for a dispassionate analysis. Believe me, I'm trying hard to sound smart about this!
In my defense, I learned something about DR #4 that few learn, that an awful (right-handed) slice or push is accommodated by the design. The architecture accommodated that junk. After multiple reports that the fourth at Dismal River is an outstanding short par 4, I will stand by my 10-9 win for Ballyneal. Will Tom D. follow the decisive 10-9 win for first holes with seventeen ties?
-- How many times do I have to play Dismal River's 4th hole before I understand how complex and interesting it is? It probably took me 25 plays before I liked Ballyneal 12th hole more than the 7th hole. The permutations of where the drive ends up, together with the various hole locations, makes the second shot fun and exciting every time.
-- Whether or not there are shades of perfect on the tee shot, I look at Jimmy Muratt's picture of the tee shot, and knowing that it is 380 yards, usually downwind, I'm going to hit 5-wood (or drill low driver into the wind) at least the first 5-7 times to see what happens. I'm pretty sure I saw the second little bunker when I played, which helped me decide 5-wood versus driver. I'm playing to my strength, trying to get wedge in my hands.
-- While exercising today, I tried to think whether there were any of Tom's short (but not drivable for me) par-4s I've played that I would rate about Ballyneal's 4th hole. Maybe Ballyneal's 12th hole, and maybe Pacific Dunes 16th hole. How many of these 330-380 yard holes turn right?
-- Eric Smith's picture on the 4th green sure makes it look like the farther right one approaches the green, the better, regardless of hole location.
-- As for underrating Ballyneal's 4th hole, I'm concerned about being too long-winded. I have trouble picking favorites at Ballyneal. The 3rd hole is my least favorite, the others are sort of a tie. If pressed, the 4th hole is in the middle somewhere.
Great to have Bruce Wellmon and Mac Plumart share their anecdotes. Mac, we see eye-to-eye on everything! So far I appear to be the appointed Ballyneal representative. I hope those familiar with the new course continue to contribute.
Has anybody here made a birdie at the 4th hole at Dismal River? How did you do it?