Jeff is correct about holding a men's open at Sebonack. The course has an unbalanced par on most days of 35 - 37, with the tips out at 3500 and in at 4000. Yes, 4000, given that you have three long holes on the second half. The only short two holes that can't go back (as of right now) are 8 and 12, both par three holes. They would be short irons or 7 iron at most for the men. Is there room for a longer tee? Probably, but why not have one or two par three holes with seriously tucked pins.
The average Joe and Josette complained about the severity of the greens. What these folks didn't understand was that each hole location sits in a target area that is supremely fair. As such, if a hole were located on either edge or the front, you would see the women practice chip shots and texas wedges from 5 to 10 yards off that side/end of the green. They were using those portions as part of the target. Tough chip shot? No tougher than a 45-feet putt over a ridge or two.
The 9th hole (normally the 1st) would be the top choice for the driveable par four. Since #8 (normally #9) is a reachable par five, the potential exists for eagle-eagle to close the front side. That's excitement, unless they turned 8 into a par four, which they probably would. Follow that up with #10, which cannot be extended beyond its current 380 and you have yet another hole waiting to be devoured by the bombers. The other par five that could be played as a two-shotter is 13...it tips at 550 and could easily be dropped into the 500-520 range.
I heard the numbers 11 (stimp) for the women and 14 (when they want madness and giggles) for club events, bandied about. My thinking is that a men's Open at Sebonack would require the USGA brass to allow for birdies to be made on holes like the short par threes, plus 9 and 10, but to balance that out with a few back-breakers, retaining the optimal even-par finish they cherish.