Having only played World Woods Pine Barrens, not in the list but widely referenced, my take is that the Fazio course was artificial to the point of being contrived. The contrivance was excellent golf. The fall away green on 10. 14 and 15. Great holes, yes, but the course seemed hollow, soulless.
I compare and contrast to CommonGrounds, which had golden age features artificially created, but plays soulfully. I think one might rate WW-PB ahead of CG, as the features are bolder and more dramatic. But CG is the course I would play 9-1.
Stepping back, compared to GA courses and minimalist courses, as well crafted as the Fazio courses are, are even the best, like Shadow Creek, structurally incapable of being the "best" because of the contrivance? Or alternately, what is it about me as a "rater" that would lead to my divergent opinion in favor of less contrivance, even as some GA courses are contrived in obvious ways, but still seem soulful?