1. Jon said he was talking about the rootzone temp not the turf. You told him they are the same thing. It's not about Jon and I and me inserting canopy when he meant roots. It's about him making a distinguishment about the two and YOU saying they are the same. And YOU are wrong. They ARE NOT THE SAME. This is about YOUR statement, not Jon's. you said it's all the same and YOU ARE WRONG.
2. "You have heard of soil probes, haven't you. When's the last time you saw someone taking the "grasses" temperature ?"
You have got to be kidding me right? Soil probes take a sample of the physical core profile. A soil probe does not take temperature. A THERMOMETER takes temperature! And superintendents and agronomists take temperatures of the CANOPY all the time! And your inexperience just proves itself in your dumb statements once again!
3. "No they're not. That's patently absurd. You'd have to be a moron to draw that conclusion, a conclusion you have to draw in order to save face.
So tell us, other than knowing the air temperature, how does one go about taking the temperature of the blades of grass ? You don't have a clue.
But we know how the temperature of the turf is taken, with a soil probe."
You're a special kind of stupid aren't you? Here's a clue...if you take a thermometer, and place the tip right on the canopy...that will give you the temp on the surface of the canopy environment. You can also use infrared thermometers that will give you canopy temps. So go on moron...go to your local superintendent and ask him to borrow his soil probe because you'd like to go take the temperature of some turf! Then wait for the face he makes when he realizes you don't know what the hell you're talking about.
4. "No kidding. Everyone on the planet knows that. NO ONE, other than you, was talking about the "canopy" or "leaf zone"
The discussion was focused on the sub-soil, not the blades of grass. You and you alone inserted the leaf zone into the discussion."
You're not allowed to use canopy because its not correct nomenclature to you. And I'll repeat myself, again, Jon referenced rootzone versus turf. It doesn't take a moron to figure out that by "turf" he means foliage or the grass or the canopy. You said it's all the same. You were wrong. Again.
5. "Not only are you a moron, but you're totally confused. I guess a little knowledge is a dangerous thing
I asked you before and I'll ask you again, are you an Agronomist ?"
Being an agronomist is completely irrelevant. This is basic Turf 101. You don't have to be an agronomist or a moron to understand it. And if being an agronomist is the only way to be credible then where do you stand Mr. Green Chairman? We all know how knowledgable Greens Chairmen are in agronomics don't we? They obviously don't know the difference between a soil probe and a thermometer!
6. "No, it wasn't, you were the one who insinuated he was a moron by declaring that he meant "canopy" when he stated over and over again that he meant "root zone". You were wrong, he meant what he typed when he typed "root zone"
ONLY A MORON WOULD THINK HE MEANT "CANOPY" WHEN HE TYPED "ROOT ZONE A DOZEN TIMES"
I haven't insinuated or called Jon anything. So go ahead and do what you do to lie and twist that I did. Please cite which post I did this. Jon referred to the "rootzone" versus "turf". You are the moron who doesn't have basic deduction skills to understand he was referring to the roots versus the grass. The grass encompassing the canopy environment. YOU ARE WRONG, BY TURF HE MEANT CANOPY. AND THE CANOPY IS NOT THE SAME AS THE ROOTS AS YOU STATE HERE.
"I talked about rootzone temp not turf. Duhh"
"Duhh ? You moron, they're the same thing !"
You are the moron Mucci. You are the joke. You are wrong and are not man enough to admit it because you're an insecure narcissist who overcompensates by being a bully and an asshole.